Healthy Lungs: Hiking vs Running ?

topic posted Thu, April 16, 2009 - 6:20 AM by  Ben
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Hello, I just joined this tribe.

I have a sort of question about Hiking vs. Running as it relates to A Good Cardio Workout.

I notice I'm more out of breath and 'winded' after running....but incline machines just 'smoke me' in no time flat.

I would imagine that steep incline hiking would be better for the gluts and leg muscles but just flat-out running fast would be better for the lungs and (possibly?) heart.

What do you all think?
Which is healthier for the heart *and* lungs?


Thanks.
posted by:
Ben
offline Ben
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Healthy Lungs: Hiking vs Running ?

    Sun, April 19, 2009 - 11:48 PM
    Hiking makes you better at hiking where running makes you better at running. You want better heart and lungs, what test will you use? If the test is more like running then running will win. At the end of the day any exercise you enjoy and can do safely is going to be best for you. So the real question is which exercise are you more likely to do?
    • Re: Healthy Lungs: Hiking vs Running ?

      Mon, April 20, 2009 - 11:53 AM
      I suppose if I *had* to take a test it'd be the usual Lung Capapcity or Lung Function Tests and BP for the heart.
      But I'm not exercising for to 'pass' a test..I want healthy lungs and heart and a test just tracks that for you...it's not the end goal.

      I understand what you're saying about enjoying exercise.

      My question remains unanswered though.
      Or rather, i think i know the answer already and its that....with the heart beating at the same rate...you are using your lungs more when running so *running would 'exercise' the lungs more than hiking*.

      At least thats my opinion after a week of reading up and thinking about it.

      It doesn't really matter because I already bought the reg. treadmill vs the 30% incline one from Nordic Track.

      yey!



      • Re: Healthy Lungs: Hiking vs Running ?

        Tue, April 21, 2009 - 9:55 PM
        Putting a treadmill at an incline isn't the same as running up a hill

        Most of those tests are such that exercise is just one factor out of many. I'd expect same results from either form if the amount/intensity are comparable. Given a similar heart rate you'll be consuming the same amount of oxygen, burning the same calories, and exercising your lungs the same amount.

        One common test used is VO2MAX. This calculates the maximum amount of oxygen you can consume, divided by your weight. Test protocols vary but they typically involve using a treadmill and increasing speed and incline over time. If you wanted to max out this test you could prepare by running at an incline and at higher speeds. Shorter more intense sessions are more likely to increase VO2MAX.

        This is however somewhat pointless. Most people (and a lot of what you find on the internet) makes wrong assumptions about VO2MAX. A typical bad assumption is that a person with a higher VO2Max will beat a person with a lower one at a sport. Current theory is that sports performance is not limited by ability to consume oxygen, but rather by feedback cycle designed to protect your body from damage.

Recent topics in "fitness"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Breakfast Mickey 1 August 27, 2009
Anyone here tried Warrior XFit workouts? offline~Sasha~ 0 August 21, 2009
In combination with exercise... diet pills Sierra 0 August 7, 2009
Olympic Dumbbell weight? Sarah Connor... 1 May 21, 2009
Treadmill Belt doctor 0 September 14, 2008